Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Parshas Mishpatim Divrei Torah
Mishpatim- Understanding the Reasons
In this week's parsha G-D starts enumerating many of the laws that govern Judaism. However, when describing how G-D gave over these commandments to the Jewish people, the Torah gives us a very unique description. It says (Shemos 21:1):
וְאֵלֶּה, הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים, אֲשֶׁר תָּשִׂים, לִפְנֵיהֶם. 1 Now these are the ordinances which thou shalt set before them.
The Torah tells us that G-D wanted Moshe to set these commandments before the Jewish people. In fact, the Torah used this language previously when discussing how Moshe was supposed to tell over the laws and commandments to the elders of the Jewish people (Shemos 19:7):
For full article click here
Mishpatim- The Importance of Physicality
The end of parshas Mishpatim is probably full of the most secretive and elusive ideas in the Torah. Before discussing the ascension of Moses to the mountain, the Torah deals with a very vague situation. First, it says, "Moses, Aharon, Nadab, Abihu, and seventy elders of Israel ascended. They saw the G-D of Israel, and under His feet was the likeness of sapphire brickwork, and it was like the essence of the heaven in purity. Against the noblemen of Israel G-D did not send His hand, they saw G-D and they ate and drank." What does it mean that all of these people ascended? It can't be that they all went up the mountain, the next pasukim say only Moshe ascended the mountain. So what is really happening here?
For full article click here
Parshas Mishpatim- The Higher Meaning
This week’s Parsha, Mishpatim, mainly talks about civil laws. Basically, the parsha discusses the importance of being kind to your fellow Jew. An example of what can be found in this week's parsha is the penalty for murder and the penalty for damages in general. It is interesting to note that a very crucial statement was made by the Jewish people in this parsha, naaseh vinishma(we will do and we will listen). This begs the question of why mention the historical event of the Jews accepting the Torah unconditionally, as naaseh venishma is understood to mean, in a parsha that discusses civil laws that seemingly have no great spiritual meaning behind them? Isn't the Torah's main purpose in order to bring us spiritually closer to G-D? In fact, even a non-Jewish country would follow most of the laws stated in this week's parsha of its own accord.
For full article click here
In this week's parsha G-D starts enumerating many of the laws that govern Judaism. However, when describing how G-D gave over these commandments to the Jewish people, the Torah gives us a very unique description. It says (Shemos 21:1):
וְאֵלֶּה, הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים, אֲשֶׁר תָּשִׂים, לִפְנֵיהֶם. 1 Now these are the ordinances which thou shalt set before them.
The Torah tells us that G-D wanted Moshe to set these commandments before the Jewish people. In fact, the Torah used this language previously when discussing how Moshe was supposed to tell over the laws and commandments to the elders of the Jewish people (Shemos 19:7):
For full article click here
Mishpatim- The Importance of Physicality
The end of parshas Mishpatim is probably full of the most secretive and elusive ideas in the Torah. Before discussing the ascension of Moses to the mountain, the Torah deals with a very vague situation. First, it says, "Moses, Aharon, Nadab, Abihu, and seventy elders of Israel ascended. They saw the G-D of Israel, and under His feet was the likeness of sapphire brickwork, and it was like the essence of the heaven in purity. Against the noblemen of Israel G-D did not send His hand, they saw G-D and they ate and drank." What does it mean that all of these people ascended? It can't be that they all went up the mountain, the next pasukim say only Moshe ascended the mountain. So what is really happening here?
For full article click here
Parshas Mishpatim- The Higher Meaning
This week’s Parsha, Mishpatim, mainly talks about civil laws. Basically, the parsha discusses the importance of being kind to your fellow Jew. An example of what can be found in this week's parsha is the penalty for murder and the penalty for damages in general. It is interesting to note that a very crucial statement was made by the Jewish people in this parsha, naaseh vinishma(we will do and we will listen). This begs the question of why mention the historical event of the Jews accepting the Torah unconditionally, as naaseh venishma is understood to mean, in a parsha that discusses civil laws that seemingly have no great spiritual meaning behind them? Isn't the Torah's main purpose in order to bring us spiritually closer to G-D? In fact, even a non-Jewish country would follow most of the laws stated in this week's parsha of its own accord.
For full article click here
Monday, February 8, 2010
Mishpatim- Understanding the Reasons
In this week's parsha G-D starts enumerating many of the laws that govern Judaism. However, when describing how G-D gave over these commandments to the Jewish people, the Torah gives us a very unique description. It says (Shemos 21:1):
וְאֵלֶּה, הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים, אֲשֶׁר תָּשִׂים, לִפְנֵיהֶם. 1 Now these are the ordinances which thou shalt set before them.
The Torah tells us that G-D wanted Moshe to set these commandments before the Jewish people. In fact, the Torah used this language previously when discussing how Moshe was supposed to tell over the laws and commandments to the elders of the Jewish people (Shemos 19:7):
Also, when Moshe was giving his final speech, in Devarim, the Torah describes his teaching of the Torah in a similar manner. This verse can further help us understand why this type of language is used and can be found in Devarim (4:44):
These verses show that when the Torah is taught the language of "setting" the Torah "before" the pupil is used. What is the significance of this type of language? How is it being taught by the teacher and how is it being absorbed by the student? Perhaps this language is used to teach us how one should teach, or perhaps it is teaching us about how one should learn the Torah? The question is, simply put, what is the significance of setting the Torah before the Jewish people, why not say that Moshe taught (Lilmoed) the Jewish people Torah or anything similar to that?
וְאֵלֶּה, הַמִּשְׁפָּטִים, אֲשֶׁר תָּשִׂים, לִפְנֵיהֶם. 1 Now these are the ordinances which thou shalt set before them.
The Torah tells us that G-D wanted Moshe to set these commandments before the Jewish people. In fact, the Torah used this language previously when discussing how Moshe was supposed to tell over the laws and commandments to the elders of the Jewish people (Shemos 19:7):
| ז וַיָּבֹא מֹשֶׁה, וַיִּקְרָא לְזִקְנֵי הָעָם; וַיָּשֶׂם לִפְנֵיהֶם, אֵת כָּל-הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלֶּה, אֲשֶׁר צִוָּהוּ, יְהוָה. | 7 And Moses came and called for the elders of the people, and set before them all these words which the LORD commanded him. |
Also, when Moshe was giving his final speech, in Devarim, the Torah describes his teaching of the Torah in a similar manner. This verse can further help us understand why this type of language is used and can be found in Devarim (4:44):
| מד וְזֹאת, הַתּוֹרָה, אֲשֶׁר-שָׂם מֹשֶׁה, לִפְנֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. | 44 And this is the law which Moses set before the children of Israel; |
To answer this question we must bring down a Gemorah found in Eiruvin (54b) that states: (Soncino translation)
R. Akiba stated: Whence is it deduced that a man must go on teaching his pupil until he has
mastered the subject? From Scripture where it says: And teach thou it to the children of Israel.32 And whence is it deduced that it must be taught until the students are well versed in it?33 From Scripture where it says. Put it in their mouths.34 And whence is it inferred that it is also his duty to explain to him the reasons?35 It has been said: Now these are the ordinances which thou shalt put before them.36
((32) Deut. XXXI, 19; emphasis on ‘teach’.
(33) Lit., ‘arranged in order in their mouth’.
(34) Deut. XXXI, 19: emphasis on ‘put . . . mouth’.
(35) Lit., ‘to show the face’. . . that it is not enough to teach dogmatically.
(36) Ex. XXI. 1, emphasis on ‘put before’ (cf. Rashi). )
Rabbi Akiva is telling us something very unique about the words "set before" (or put before). G-D, in his infinite wisdom, realized that man must understand before he can perform actions. There are different levels of understanding, but in order to do something worth anything, there must first be understanding. Without any type of understanding, there is no purpose to the action. This is why we see that G-D commanded Moshe to set the Torah before the Jewish people. Moshe had to explain and give the reasons for the laws in the Torah.
This is one of the reasons why I believe even the laws that we have nowadays, like ritual slaughter, that seemingly have no reason, must have originally been taught with the reason. Everything in Judaism needs to make sense, logic is an integral part of the Jewish religion. Without logic there is no understanding and without understanding there is no true learning.
People nowadays are all to content with just learning the basic halacha, how to pray and go through the motions without ever understanding what they are doing. These actions are essentially worthless without deeper understanding. That is why G-D gave the Torah and specifically told Moshe, "Place it before the Jewish People." G-D was saying make sure they understand what they are doing and the reasons behind these actions. Knowledge leads to a closer connection to Torah and to G-D.
Labels:
Connect to G-D,
Mishpatim,
Parsha,
Reasons for commandments,
Torah
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Rambam- Index for Mishna Torah
Mishna Torah:
Yisodei Hatorah:
First Chapter:
First Halacha: What is G-D and His Creation
Second Halacha: How Do We View G-D
Third Halacha: G-D's Existence in contrast with our own
Fourth Halacha: G-D is the Only Supreme Being
Fifth Halacha: G-D's Infinite Power
Sixth Halacha: Understanding G-D
Seventh Halacha: The Singularity of G-D
Eighth Halacha: Proof G-D has no Body
Ninth Halacha: How We Relate to G-D
Tenth Halacha: Comprehending G-D
Eleventh Halacha: Attributes that Can't Apply to G-D
Twelfth Halacha: How to Explain Contradictions about G-D Having Physicality
Second Chapter:
First Halacha: Relationship With G-D
Second Halacha: To Know G-D is to Love and Fear Him
Third Halacha: The Three Types of Creations
Fourth Halacha: How Prophets View Angels
Fifth Halacha: Differences Between Angels
Sixth Halacha: Higher Angels and Lower Angels
Seventh Halacha: Ten Types of Angels
Eighth Halacha: The Angels' Understanding of G-D
Ninth Halacha: What G-D's Perception of Himself Means
Tenth Halacha: How G-D's Knowledge and Existence Can Relate to Man
Eleventh Halacha: Maaseh Merkavah (Subject Title for Discussing G-D's Existence)
Twelfth Halacha: Warning Against Teaching Maaseh Merkavah
Yisodei Hatorah:
First Chapter:
First Halacha: What is G-D and His Creation
Second Halacha: How Do We View G-D
Third Halacha: G-D's Existence in contrast with our own
Fourth Halacha: G-D is the Only Supreme Being
Fifth Halacha: G-D's Infinite Power
Sixth Halacha: Understanding G-D
Seventh Halacha: The Singularity of G-D
Eighth Halacha: Proof G-D has no Body
Ninth Halacha: How We Relate to G-D
Tenth Halacha: Comprehending G-D
Eleventh Halacha: Attributes that Can't Apply to G-D
Twelfth Halacha: How to Explain Contradictions about G-D Having Physicality
Second Chapter:
First Halacha: Relationship With G-D
Second Halacha: To Know G-D is to Love and Fear Him
Third Halacha: The Three Types of Creations
Fourth Halacha: How Prophets View Angels
Fifth Halacha: Differences Between Angels
Sixth Halacha: Higher Angels and Lower Angels
Seventh Halacha: Ten Types of Angels
Eighth Halacha: The Angels' Understanding of G-D
Ninth Halacha: What G-D's Perception of Himself Means
Tenth Halacha: How G-D's Knowledge and Existence Can Relate to Man
Eleventh Halacha: Maaseh Merkavah (Subject Title for Discussing G-D's Existence)
Twelfth Halacha: Warning Against Teaching Maaseh Merkavah
Third Chapter
Labels:
Rambam,
Rambam Index
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Yisro Divrei Torah
Here are the Divrei Torah that I have on Yisro with the first paragraph that gives you a little taste of the super duper or Geshmack Divrei Torah:
Read more here.
Read more here.
Moshe's Judaism vs Yisro's Judaism
In this week's parsha Yisro comes and meets up with Moshe and the Jewish people. The most interesting event that occurs between Moshe and Yisro is a conversation where Yisro gives Moshe advice as to how Moshe should lead the people. The conversation goes like this (Shemos 18:14):Read more here.
Parshas Yisro- Thunder, Lightening, Clouds and the Sound of The Shofar- The Essence of The Torah
In this week's parsha of Yisro, G-D tells the ten commandments to the Jewish people. A confusing aspect of the revelation at Mt. Sinai is why was there thunder, lightening, a thick mist and a powerful sound of the Shofar? What do these four things have anything to do with the giving of the Torah? Shouldn't it be a sunny day where everything is beautiful and peaceful?Read more here.
Parshas Yisro- Anochi Hashem, Why is it Unique?
In this week's parsha of Yisro we have the ten commandments. Now, everyone knows the first commandment, “Anochi Hashem”!(I am G-D). But we have to ask, isn’t there something amiss about this commandment. Not in a logical sense, but rather if it is in fact a commandment why doesn’t it start with an actual command like all the other commandments? G-d is saying He is G-d, but by the other commandments He says do this, or don’t do this. Here however He just makes a statement. I will give you a couple commandments to contrast it with. “Lo taaseh licha pesel”(You SHALL NOT make for yourself a graven image) Also “Zachor es yom hashabos”(Remember the Sabbath day) Zachor is written in the tzivuy(command) form and hence is a command. So what is the reason the first commandment is not written like all the other commandments?
Read More here.
I hope you enjoy and have a great Shabbos.
Read More here.
I hope you enjoy and have a great Shabbos.
Labels:
Parsha,
Tiferes Yisroel
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Moshe's Judaism vs Yisro's Judaism
In this week's parsha Yisro comes and meets up with Moshe and the Jewish people. The most interesting event that occurs between Moshe and Yisro is a conversation where Yisro gives Moshe advice as to how Moshe should lead the people. The conversation goes like this (Shemos 18:14):
This seems so strange. First off, Yisro says that Moshe is doing a great disservice to the people by making them wait on line to speak with him. Next, Yisro says that Moshe himself will not be able to continue this ill begotten practice for much longer. Then Yisro tells Moshe to teach "them" the Torah and laws. Finally, he tells Moshe to set up leaders of thousands, hundreds and tens that can guide the people. The question here is, simply put, what exactly is going on. What was Moshe doing before Yisro suggested these changes?
If one takes a closer look at the verses he or she will notice something strange. It seems like Moshe, at this point, had not taught anyone any Torah or laws whatsoever. This is seen in verse 20 where Yisro tells Moshe, "Teach them the Torah and its laws!" This is then followed by verse 21 where it says, After you teach them appoint leaders for them that are the best and the brightest to answer any further questions. However, how could Moshe not have taught the Jewish people the Torah at a point where they already had the Torah and it's laws?
It seems to me that Moshe Rabbeinu and Yisro had different ideas as to how the Jewish religion was supposed to exist. Moshe thought that there was supposed to be one person that connects to G-D and tells everyone else what to do. No one can make a move without asking G-D how to behave. In essence, he thought the Jewish people were supposed to be like angels. This makes sense because they had just experienced so many miracles and such high levels of prophecy.
Yisro, on the other hand, came from a completely different background. He had just come from Midyan where life was very humanistic and filled with physicality. If Moshe had continued treating the Jewish people in a purely spiritual manner, they would have never been able to survive in the land of Israel. Living like angels was only possible in the desert where the hand of G-D is seen continuously and constantly. Therefore, Yisro told Moshe to wake up and smell the coffee. He told Moshe, like any good father-in-law would, that he was living in a fantasy world. "You and these people will grow weary of this," Yisro said.
How can the Jewish people consult Moshe on every detail of their life? Yisro was arguing that human comprehension and choices must be allowed and encouraged. Also, the point yisro was trying to bring across to Moshe was that his place was not as a puppet master where every action must go through him and ultimately G-D, but the people must have free choice and their own logical input. "Teach them the Torah and let them figure it out." However, Yisro did not want Moshe discontinuing his leadership role, no, no, no. Yisro was telling Moshe that there must be guidance and therefore, the best and the brightest should guide when there are simple questions and Moshe should be consulted when no one else can figure out the halacha.
Yisro was setting up a nation that could survive in a world where prophecy would not be constant. Yisro knew how the world outside of the desert worked and how to set up a community. That is why the verse tells us that Yisro was the priest of Midyan, because he understood how to lead a nation. One can not act as a leader by controlling every move of his subjects, rather one must teach the subjects how to make the right choices. That is the only way to lead without becoming weary yourself and without making your subjects weary of you.
To make this relevant to today, like I always try to do, let's ask how can it be that people feel like they always need to ask their Rabbi everything? "Rebbe, can I get a job?" "No my talmid, you must study forever." However, in the meantime this man's wife and he are stressed because they have no money. Unfortunately, I have heard this story many times. Also, the countless amount of times that one must ask a Rabbi about every little thing he or she does. We should learn from this story in Yisro, G-D wants us to figure out the halacha with our own knowledge. We have the Shulchan Orech, Aruch Hashulchan, Igros Moshe, Mishnah Berurah and so on. These are tools that allow us to figure out the halacha and know what to do. Serious questions like Niddah questions, certain kashrus questions and the like require a Rabbi, but we need to be able to know what to do in everyday life.
This seems so strange. First off, Yisro says that Moshe is doing a great disservice to the people by making them wait on line to speak with him. Next, Yisro says that Moshe himself will not be able to continue this ill begotten practice for much longer. Then Yisro tells Moshe to teach "them" the Torah and laws. Finally, he tells Moshe to set up leaders of thousands, hundreds and tens that can guide the people. The question here is, simply put, what exactly is going on. What was Moshe doing before Yisro suggested these changes?
If one takes a closer look at the verses he or she will notice something strange. It seems like Moshe, at this point, had not taught anyone any Torah or laws whatsoever. This is seen in verse 20 where Yisro tells Moshe, "Teach them the Torah and its laws!" This is then followed by verse 21 where it says, After you teach them appoint leaders for them that are the best and the brightest to answer any further questions. However, how could Moshe not have taught the Jewish people the Torah at a point where they already had the Torah and it's laws?
It seems to me that Moshe Rabbeinu and Yisro had different ideas as to how the Jewish religion was supposed to exist. Moshe thought that there was supposed to be one person that connects to G-D and tells everyone else what to do. No one can make a move without asking G-D how to behave. In essence, he thought the Jewish people were supposed to be like angels. This makes sense because they had just experienced so many miracles and such high levels of prophecy.
Yisro, on the other hand, came from a completely different background. He had just come from Midyan where life was very humanistic and filled with physicality. If Moshe had continued treating the Jewish people in a purely spiritual manner, they would have never been able to survive in the land of Israel. Living like angels was only possible in the desert where the hand of G-D is seen continuously and constantly. Therefore, Yisro told Moshe to wake up and smell the coffee. He told Moshe, like any good father-in-law would, that he was living in a fantasy world. "You and these people will grow weary of this," Yisro said.
How can the Jewish people consult Moshe on every detail of their life? Yisro was arguing that human comprehension and choices must be allowed and encouraged. Also, the point yisro was trying to bring across to Moshe was that his place was not as a puppet master where every action must go through him and ultimately G-D, but the people must have free choice and their own logical input. "Teach them the Torah and let them figure it out." However, Yisro did not want Moshe discontinuing his leadership role, no, no, no. Yisro was telling Moshe that there must be guidance and therefore, the best and the brightest should guide when there are simple questions and Moshe should be consulted when no one else can figure out the halacha.
Yisro was setting up a nation that could survive in a world where prophecy would not be constant. Yisro knew how the world outside of the desert worked and how to set up a community. That is why the verse tells us that Yisro was the priest of Midyan, because he understood how to lead a nation. One can not act as a leader by controlling every move of his subjects, rather one must teach the subjects how to make the right choices. That is the only way to lead without becoming weary yourself and without making your subjects weary of you.
To make this relevant to today, like I always try to do, let's ask how can it be that people feel like they always need to ask their Rabbi everything? "Rebbe, can I get a job?" "No my talmid, you must study forever." However, in the meantime this man's wife and he are stressed because they have no money. Unfortunately, I have heard this story many times. Also, the countless amount of times that one must ask a Rabbi about every little thing he or she does. We should learn from this story in Yisro, G-D wants us to figure out the halacha with our own knowledge. We have the Shulchan Orech, Aruch Hashulchan, Igros Moshe, Mishnah Berurah and so on. These are tools that allow us to figure out the halacha and know what to do. Serious questions like Niddah questions, certain kashrus questions and the like require a Rabbi, but we need to be able to know what to do in everyday life.
Labels:
Jewish Philosophy,
Parsha,
Yisro
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Jewish Laws: The Categories
I enjoy thinking about the origins of Judaism, how it has evolved and the current mentality of the religion. It is amazing to see how much Judaism has been effected by other cultures and how Judaism has shaped those cultures around it. However, when one does this type of research it opens the door for many questions. Namely, how is the current state of our religion, orthodox Judaism, the heir to the original form of Judaism. How can we claim that this is the proper path for us to be following? Many people claim that the Pharisees perverted the religion and others say the more modern Rabbis have completely distorted the way of worshiping G-D. So, why should we believe that "halachic" Judaism is the proper way? Are these laws really from G-D?
One must realize that many of the laws that we follow, like a man wearing a head covering, is completely made up by the Rabbis without any source in the Torah. It is a custom that was accepted by the Jewish people, but was not a command from G-D. Why then do we follow these types of laws without fail?
There are also laws that are stated explicitly in the Torah, like no kindling a fire on Shabbos. These are clear commands directly from G-D that require no interpretation. It is obvious why these commands must be followed, they are from G-D!
A third category of laws are those that are derived from the Torah by the Rabbis. Meaning, they were directly from G-D, but they were oral traditions that G-D told to the Jewish people. A good example of this are the prohibitions on shabbos, namely the majority of the thirty nine melachos (39 Jobs that were done in the temple or mishkan). The Torah says that one can not do melacha, work, on shabbos, but never defines what work it is talking about. The Rabbis tell us that through the oral tradition G-D made known to us what melacha He was speaking of.
These are the three types of halachas that we have: directly from G-D that can be understood straight from the Torah; from G-D that was transmitted orally and the Rabbis tell us the oral tradition; and laws that are completely made up by the Rabbis without any input from G-D.
Everyone who believes the Torah was given by G-D should agree that anything commanded straight in the Torah should be followed because it is the direct words of G-D. Anyone who does not can not reasonably claim that they, either, follow judaism or believe that G-D gave the Torah. That means that on shabbos, anyone who believes G-D gave the Torah and they want to follow Judaism can not light a fire. There is no differentiating betweek any type of actual fire, because G-D says do not kindle a fire. Anyone kindling a fire is not following Judaism, doesn't believe G-D gave the Torah or they realize they are sinning.
One must realize that many of the laws that we follow, like a man wearing a head covering, is completely made up by the Rabbis without any source in the Torah. It is a custom that was accepted by the Jewish people, but was not a command from G-D. Why then do we follow these types of laws without fail?
There are also laws that are stated explicitly in the Torah, like no kindling a fire on Shabbos. These are clear commands directly from G-D that require no interpretation. It is obvious why these commands must be followed, they are from G-D!
A third category of laws are those that are derived from the Torah by the Rabbis. Meaning, they were directly from G-D, but they were oral traditions that G-D told to the Jewish people. A good example of this are the prohibitions on shabbos, namely the majority of the thirty nine melachos (39 Jobs that were done in the temple or mishkan). The Torah says that one can not do melacha, work, on shabbos, but never defines what work it is talking about. The Rabbis tell us that through the oral tradition G-D made known to us what melacha He was speaking of.
These are the three types of halachas that we have: directly from G-D that can be understood straight from the Torah; from G-D that was transmitted orally and the Rabbis tell us the oral tradition; and laws that are completely made up by the Rabbis without any input from G-D.
Everyone who believes the Torah was given by G-D should agree that anything commanded straight in the Torah should be followed because it is the direct words of G-D. Anyone who does not can not reasonably claim that they, either, follow judaism or believe that G-D gave the Torah. That means that on shabbos, anyone who believes G-D gave the Torah and they want to follow Judaism can not light a fire. There is no differentiating betweek any type of actual fire, because G-D says do not kindle a fire. Anyone kindling a fire is not following Judaism, doesn't believe G-D gave the Torah or they realize they are sinning.
The next two categories deal with the Rabbis interpretations and their own laws. These two ideas are less clear cut with regard to what the halacha is in actuality. Whose interpretation do we follow as being the words of G-D? There are many arguments within the Gemorah itself and even after that there are many doubts. Wy should the Jewish people follow anyones interpretation? How are we to know that it is authentic? Also, if it is not authentic, then are we actually going against G-D's will?
To explain this, one needs to look at the verse in parshas Shoftim (Devarim 17:11) that says "According to the law which they shall teach thee, and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do; thou shalt not turn aside from the sentence which they shall declare unto thee, to the right hand, nor to the left."
This verse tells us that G-D expects us to listen to our leaders. However, how far does this go? Does it give them a right to interpret the Torah only? Does it give them the right to add on safeguards to the Torah's law? Does it give them the power to make any law they decide without any real foundation in the Torah? What are the parameters of this law?
Hopefully, since this post is getting a little long, I will discuss the different ideas of how far the Rabbis can go and how far they have gone in the past with regard to their authority at a later post.
Labels:
Cultural Ideas
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Parshas Bishalach Posts
Here are some Divrei Torah that you may enjoy. Check them out and let me know what you think
The Importance of Humbleness
Forgetting is Not Acceptable
Why the Long Route
The Importance of Humbleness
Forgetting is Not Acceptable
Why the Long Route
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







